DESPITE the Prime Minister, John Howard, criticising some Muslims for being "very resistant to integration", new figures show they have adapted to speaking English more quickly than other religious groups.
Full article
Monday, November 20, 2006
Saturday, November 18, 2006
Al Jazeera just launched its English-language channel
Will You Watch Al Jazeera English?
Amar C. Bakshi - The Arabic news network Al Jazeera just launched its English-language channel today. According to the station's Director General Wadah Khanfar, its goal is to "revolutionize TV news by giving voice to the oppressed South." This sounds ambitious. Will Al Jazeera English live up to it? Watch a clip below and tell us what you think.
Links: WATCH Al Jazeera LIVE NOW
The station is certainly not lacking in resources. Qatar's Emir Sheikh Hamad bin Khalifa al-Thani has staffed it with 500 reporters spread across the world. They've managed to pull some big names from CNN, BBC, and even the U.S. Marines like Riz Khan, Sir David Frost, and Josh Rushing respectively.
Al Jazeera's bureaus in Washington DC, London, Kuala Lumpur, and Doha house over one hundred employees each and are immaculately designed. I visited their Doha headquarters two weeks ago exactly on the station's tenth anniversary. Though I was in the city for a United Nations conference on emerging democracies, the Al Jazeera compound was where all the action was.
In their main English language newsroom, a vast plasma image of the globe illuminated the anchor desks. Skinny silver computers stood perched on custom-curved desks. "We've spared no expense," exclaimed a young Egyptian employee, quoting the billionaire scientist from the movie Jurassic Park. He explained that Al Jazeera's "polish proves its professionalism." But then he quickly changed gears to stress that Al Jazeera would win world support only "by sounding truly different from our competitors like CNN and BBC."
Al Jazeera's consultant on Middle East affairs and new PostGlobal panelist Lamis Andoni outlined just what "different" meant:
Al Jazeera will cover the developing world; it will offer another view on the Israel-Palestine conflict. It will inject international discourse with the arguments of and the social and economic plights of the South to enable a real dialog.
With her voice rising, she gestured toward a huge photograph hanging on the newsroom wall of a young Al Jazeera cameraman picked up on the border of Afghanistan and imprisoned at Guantanamo Bay:
Al Jazeera's status was earned at a high price. Cameraman Sami al-Hajj is spending his fifth year in Guantanamo. Two of our journalists are killed -- one during the American bombing of Al Jazeera in Baghdad. Our top correspondent Tayser Allouny is under house arrest in Spain for unsubstantiated charges. These colleagues are an inspiration for the rest of us, a call to courage, and a constant reminder of the cost of telling the story.
She then swept her arm across the newsroom pointing to dozens of young faces scurrying in and out of the building. Many of these employees were British and Australian students fresh out of college, sweating in the hundred-degree Doha heat. According to Andoni, they too share her vision:
There are many young people who are coming on board, and many seeking to. They want to be part of a new, more inclusive, daring medium -- a medium that speaks truth to power.
But an hour's flight away in Dubai, another PostGlobal panelist, Bashir Goth expressed far less hope for Al Jazeera English. Many across the world, especially in America, think Al Jazeera inexcusably promoted Osama bin Laden for mutual benefit. Al Jazeera achieved substantial publicity by airing the terrorist's videos before anyone else could see them. Bin Laden, many scholars argue, would not have been a global celebrity without the TV platform Al Jazeera offered. By airing his clips, the Wall Street Journal argues that Al Jazeera became a "mouthpiece of Osama bin Laden," offering free publicity that helped him recruit more fighters. When I asked Director General Wadah Khanfar if Al Jazeera English would show more bin Laden tapes should they be released, he replied forcefully, "Yes, we will abide by the same editorial guidelines as our Arabic channel."
Though Al Jazeera launched today, it will be tough to find in the United States. Cable companies here worry that in the minds of Americans Al Jazeera is too closely associated with Al Qaeda for comfort. The station's presentation -- some would say selective presentation -- of atrocities in the Middle East, especially in Iraq, Palestine and most recently Lebanon, have inflamed anti-American sentiment.
On multiple occasions, officials within the Bush administration accused the station of willfully stirring hatred toward America. As Al Jazeera's introductory video boasts, Donald Rumsfeld called their broadcasts "vicious, inaccurate and inexcusable". Rumors circulate that America even considered it an outright military target after it bombed its offices in Kabul.
But beyond the simple accusation that Al Jazeera aids terror groups comes a more fundamental criticism. Is the station's articulated concern for "voices from the South," for the billions who don't watch TV but are affected by the global players who do, a genuine one or just more anti-West rhetoric? Will this station really open up new debates that are often overlooked like poor education, weak public health systems, or hunger? Or will Al Jazeera just add to the cacophony of angry voices and polarized discussions, perhaps even promoting violence in the process by providing a platform for an extreme few?
What do you think? Have you watched Al Jazeera in Arabic and do you have thoughts to share?
Below, we invite our global readers to discuss the clip, share their view of Al Jazeera, and debate whether the station's call to "lift oppressed voices" is hollow rhetoric, dangerous propaganda, or a cause for hope.
http://blog.washingtonpost.com/postglobal/needtoknow/2006/11/will_you_watch_al_jazeera_engl_1.html
Read all Comments / Post new Comment
You must have Google Gmail account to be able to leave comments. Sign up for Gmail
Amar C. Bakshi - The Arabic news network Al Jazeera just launched its English-language channel today. According to the station's Director General Wadah Khanfar, its goal is to "revolutionize TV news by giving voice to the oppressed South." This sounds ambitious. Will Al Jazeera English live up to it? Watch a clip below and tell us what you think.
Links: WATCH Al Jazeera LIVE NOW
The station is certainly not lacking in resources. Qatar's Emir Sheikh Hamad bin Khalifa al-Thani has staffed it with 500 reporters spread across the world. They've managed to pull some big names from CNN, BBC, and even the U.S. Marines like Riz Khan, Sir David Frost, and Josh Rushing respectively.
Al Jazeera's bureaus in Washington DC, London, Kuala Lumpur, and Doha house over one hundred employees each and are immaculately designed. I visited their Doha headquarters two weeks ago exactly on the station's tenth anniversary. Though I was in the city for a United Nations conference on emerging democracies, the Al Jazeera compound was where all the action was.
In their main English language newsroom, a vast plasma image of the globe illuminated the anchor desks. Skinny silver computers stood perched on custom-curved desks. "We've spared no expense," exclaimed a young Egyptian employee, quoting the billionaire scientist from the movie Jurassic Park. He explained that Al Jazeera's "polish proves its professionalism." But then he quickly changed gears to stress that Al Jazeera would win world support only "by sounding truly different from our competitors like CNN and BBC."
Al Jazeera's consultant on Middle East affairs and new PostGlobal panelist Lamis Andoni outlined just what "different" meant:
Al Jazeera will cover the developing world; it will offer another view on the Israel-Palestine conflict. It will inject international discourse with the arguments of and the social and economic plights of the South to enable a real dialog.
With her voice rising, she gestured toward a huge photograph hanging on the newsroom wall of a young Al Jazeera cameraman picked up on the border of Afghanistan and imprisoned at Guantanamo Bay:
Al Jazeera's status was earned at a high price. Cameraman Sami al-Hajj is spending his fifth year in Guantanamo. Two of our journalists are killed -- one during the American bombing of Al Jazeera in Baghdad. Our top correspondent Tayser Allouny is under house arrest in Spain for unsubstantiated charges. These colleagues are an inspiration for the rest of us, a call to courage, and a constant reminder of the cost of telling the story.
She then swept her arm across the newsroom pointing to dozens of young faces scurrying in and out of the building. Many of these employees were British and Australian students fresh out of college, sweating in the hundred-degree Doha heat. According to Andoni, they too share her vision:
There are many young people who are coming on board, and many seeking to. They want to be part of a new, more inclusive, daring medium -- a medium that speaks truth to power.
But an hour's flight away in Dubai, another PostGlobal panelist, Bashir Goth expressed far less hope for Al Jazeera English. Many across the world, especially in America, think Al Jazeera inexcusably promoted Osama bin Laden for mutual benefit. Al Jazeera achieved substantial publicity by airing the terrorist's videos before anyone else could see them. Bin Laden, many scholars argue, would not have been a global celebrity without the TV platform Al Jazeera offered. By airing his clips, the Wall Street Journal argues that Al Jazeera became a "mouthpiece of Osama bin Laden," offering free publicity that helped him recruit more fighters. When I asked Director General Wadah Khanfar if Al Jazeera English would show more bin Laden tapes should they be released, he replied forcefully, "Yes, we will abide by the same editorial guidelines as our Arabic channel."
Though Al Jazeera launched today, it will be tough to find in the United States. Cable companies here worry that in the minds of Americans Al Jazeera is too closely associated with Al Qaeda for comfort. The station's presentation -- some would say selective presentation -- of atrocities in the Middle East, especially in Iraq, Palestine and most recently Lebanon, have inflamed anti-American sentiment.
On multiple occasions, officials within the Bush administration accused the station of willfully stirring hatred toward America. As Al Jazeera's introductory video boasts, Donald Rumsfeld called their broadcasts "vicious, inaccurate and inexcusable". Rumors circulate that America even considered it an outright military target after it bombed its offices in Kabul.
But beyond the simple accusation that Al Jazeera aids terror groups comes a more fundamental criticism. Is the station's articulated concern for "voices from the South," for the billions who don't watch TV but are affected by the global players who do, a genuine one or just more anti-West rhetoric? Will this station really open up new debates that are often overlooked like poor education, weak public health systems, or hunger? Or will Al Jazeera just add to the cacophony of angry voices and polarized discussions, perhaps even promoting violence in the process by providing a platform for an extreme few?
What do you think? Have you watched Al Jazeera in Arabic and do you have thoughts to share?
Below, we invite our global readers to discuss the clip, share their view of Al Jazeera, and debate whether the station's call to "lift oppressed voices" is hollow rhetoric, dangerous propaganda, or a cause for hope.
http://blog.washingtonpost.com/postglobal/needtoknow/2006/11/will_you_watch_al_jazeera_engl_1.html
Read all Comments / Post new Comment
You must have Google Gmail account to be able to leave comments. Sign up for Gmail
Thursday, November 16, 2006
Some political remarks racist: former PM
November 16, 2006
Former prime minister Malcolm Fraser believes many comments by Australia's politicians about Islam are racist.
Mr Fraser also said many of the words used to stimulate debate about the need for a set of Australian values were code for saying Muslims did not comply with Australian values.
And he questioned whether the next federal election would be fought using a race card.
Mr Fraser made the statements during the official launch of the Australians All website aimed at promoting an inclusive, diverse, multicultural, peaceful and prosperous Australia.
More than 40 eminent Australians are involved in Australians All - taken from the opening line of the national anthem - including ACTU president Sharan Burrow, the Reverend Tim Costello, Islamic Council of Victoria's Waleed Aly, and Muslim Community Reference Group chair Dr Ameer Ali.
The members say they were forced to begin the website because of a lack of positive political leadership and diverse discussion about Australian issues.
"I think, and we all felt, that Australia needs a voice for sanity, for reason, for inclusiveness, for acceptance, for respect for diversity, respect for difference, and knowing of course that people who live in this country accept Australian laws and the primacy of Australian democracy and all the things which are necessary for a peaceful and prosperous Australia," Mr Fraser told reporters in Melbourne.
Mr Fraser said no government had used the race card to build fear among Australians, until the "children overboard" scandal before the last federal election.
"(That) created fears about followers of Islam, fears about people who are different, fears of people who came from a different country ... I don't recall anyone from the parliament getting up and saying, `well we need to respect, we need to support people fleeing the Taliban'... no, we were told they were not the sort of people we wanted to have in Australia," Mr Fraser said.
Asked if he thought the current comments about the Islamic community were racist, he said: "Many of them, yes".
"I don't think it's restricted to one party or to one group because ... if there was a really vigorous debate about these issues in Canberra, a lot of the members of this supporting group might have felt, `well there's no need for us to do it, because there is a public debate about it'," he said.
"But what public debate has there been?"
Mr Fraser said the short term goal of the website was to provoke a moderation of language used to discuss Australian issues.
"If language is used that plays a race card, we will do what we can to expose it," he said.
"People do use coded words which are saying, `this group is not really conforming', and implying that this group don't really accept Australian values and whatever, we'll try and expose it."
Article link
Former prime minister Malcolm Fraser believes many comments by Australia's politicians about Islam are racist.
Mr Fraser also said many of the words used to stimulate debate about the need for a set of Australian values were code for saying Muslims did not comply with Australian values.
And he questioned whether the next federal election would be fought using a race card.
Mr Fraser made the statements during the official launch of the Australians All website aimed at promoting an inclusive, diverse, multicultural, peaceful and prosperous Australia.
More than 40 eminent Australians are involved in Australians All - taken from the opening line of the national anthem - including ACTU president Sharan Burrow, the Reverend Tim Costello, Islamic Council of Victoria's Waleed Aly, and Muslim Community Reference Group chair Dr Ameer Ali.
The members say they were forced to begin the website because of a lack of positive political leadership and diverse discussion about Australian issues.
"I think, and we all felt, that Australia needs a voice for sanity, for reason, for inclusiveness, for acceptance, for respect for diversity, respect for difference, and knowing of course that people who live in this country accept Australian laws and the primacy of Australian democracy and all the things which are necessary for a peaceful and prosperous Australia," Mr Fraser told reporters in Melbourne.
Mr Fraser said no government had used the race card to build fear among Australians, until the "children overboard" scandal before the last federal election.
"(That) created fears about followers of Islam, fears about people who are different, fears of people who came from a different country ... I don't recall anyone from the parliament getting up and saying, `well we need to respect, we need to support people fleeing the Taliban'... no, we were told they were not the sort of people we wanted to have in Australia," Mr Fraser said.
Asked if he thought the current comments about the Islamic community were racist, he said: "Many of them, yes".
"I don't think it's restricted to one party or to one group because ... if there was a really vigorous debate about these issues in Canberra, a lot of the members of this supporting group might have felt, `well there's no need for us to do it, because there is a public debate about it'," he said.
"But what public debate has there been?"
Mr Fraser said the short term goal of the website was to provoke a moderation of language used to discuss Australian issues.
"If language is used that plays a race card, we will do what we can to expose it," he said.
"People do use coded words which are saying, `this group is not really conforming', and implying that this group don't really accept Australian values and whatever, we'll try and expose it."
Article link
Monday, November 06, 2006
Muslim Media Watch, Cameron Stewart about sheikh Omran
Compare Cameron Stewart (The Australian) article about sheikh Omran with the press conference video in the first episode of Muslim Media Watch.
Read all Comments / Post new Comment
You must have Google Gmail account to be able to leave comments. Sign up for Gmail
Read all Comments / Post new Comment
You must have Google Gmail account to be able to leave comments. Sign up for Gmail
Thursday, November 02, 2006
Sheikh Omran's Press Conference re Hilaly comments
Media interview with Sheikh Mohamed Omran (Abu Ayman) about Mufti Taj al-Dene Elhilaly comments, role of the mufty, Islamic judgement and role of the media in all of this.
Listen and compare to media reports...
Read all Comments / Post new Comment
You must have Google Gmail account to be able to leave comments. Sign up for Gmail
Listen and compare to media reports...
Read all Comments / Post new Comment
You must have Google Gmail account to be able to leave comments. Sign up for Gmail
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
